|
|
Post by emilysrevolution on Oct 20, 2003 18:40:36 GMT -5
Emily, while I appreciate that you would love to get into my pants, I really don't wear panties. Plus, dear me, I don't know if you look that good. Heck, for all I know you may be no more attractive than Rick. And dear me, he's a real honker. But I digress. I like finding what the problem is first. Solving the problems come later. You assumed why I came here on your own. That's your error, not mine. You should never assume why anyone comes to a forum, or why they choose to participate. Your next error is assuming that what I choose to impart in a post to you is a complete answer in and of itself. Being a Democrat, I can see why that gets you in so much trouble. Democrats, being a self-limiting bunch, do tend to be "what I see is all there is" sorts of people. Thus, if I post that "The sun is shining" you are likely to assuming it always did shine, never rose, and will never set. Fear not, while you thought you were beginning to sound like a bitch, that surely wasn't the case. As to playing Devil's advocate, not me either. I am only my own advocate. As to the Devil, he has his own advocates. They are represented in the party of the Ass. Mr. Clark I believe is their frontrunner. I am not so much looking for a complete answer here. I have given up any pipe dream of that occuring. I am moreover looking for any answer to any question you see fit to answer. In that respect, you haven't offered too much (outside of some mildly witty retort which I would never suggest isn't much). You're cute (or is that just another Democratic assumption?) and thanks for the advice. I fully appreciate the person who is willing to tell me what I should and should not do. That quality is so few and far between, not unlike the sarcasm throughout this forum. It is not "what I see is all there is" that makes me a Democrat. It is "actions speak louder than words" that makes me a Virgo. But you know me so well, I leave the assumptions to you. I already know why I'm a Democrat. I will say that at least my assumptions, I am willing to admit are assumptions. Not that you are not. Far be it from me to assume anything. I have, as you know, been warned against such things. I am not surprised in the least that you are your own advocate. I am surprised you believe in the Devil as anything more than catch phrase but I make no assumptions. Evil, whatever you choose to call it, is everywhere; at my house and yours. And with the system we have, Libertarians would be as guilty as any other party would at committing acts of corruption with equal power and financing, I believe. I don't how it all keeps getting back to my ass, but I would prefer to call Dr. Dean the frontrunner over the General. |
|
|
|
Post by RS Davis on Oct 20, 2003 21:17:25 GMT -5
Emily, while I appreciate that you would love to get into my pants, I really don't wear panties. Plus, dear me, I don't know if you look that good. Heck, for all I know you may be no more attractive than Rick. And dear me, he's a real honker. Well, fear not, because I can vouch for Emily. She is gorgeous - a sensual godess. She is sex on two legs. Not that she is a slut by any means, but when she walks into a room, even gay guys start thinking about sex. In fact, my only regret in life is that I never slept with her before I got married.  As for me, I'll have you know I am quite handsome - my mommy told me so... - Rick |
|
|
|
Post by CJYJTJ on Oct 20, 2003 21:38:16 GMT -5
Well, fear not, because I can vouch for Emily. She is gorgeous - a sensual godess. She is sex on two legs. Not that she is a slut by any means, but when she walks into a room, even gay guys start thinking about sex. In fact, my only regret in life is that I never slept with her before I got married. As for me, I'll have you know I am quite handsome - my mommy told me so... - Rick So you say, remember, I used to work for Enterprise, and in I.T. no less. I've already arranged for a data dump of everything about you. I know all there is about you, and some things you may not even know about yourself now, buddy. As to Em, it matters not to me. Being a faithful husband, I am uninterested. My wife is the best thing that ever happened to me, so Em may be a goddess (which, considering she's a Democrats seems contradictory, but I'll take your word for it. Seems to me that one's mind is the most important part of being a goddess, but if you say so...) but it doesn't matter. Why did you send this as a link to her picture?  |
|
|
|
Post by CJYJTJ on Oct 20, 2003 22:43:00 GMT -5
I am not so much looking for a complete answer here. I have given up any pipe dream of that occuring. I am moreover looking for any answer to any question you see fit to answer. In that respect, you haven't offered too much (outside of some mildly witty retort which I would never suggest isn't much). You're cute (or is that just another Democratic assumption?) and thanks for the advice. I fully appreciate the person who is willing to tell me what I should and should not do. That quality is so few and far between, not unlike the sarcasm throughout this forum. It is not "what I see is all there is" that makes me a Democrat. It is "actions speak louder than words" that makes me a Virgo. But you know me so well, I leave the assumptions to you. I already know why I'm a Democrat. I will say that at least my assumptions, I am willing to admit are assumptions. Not that you are not. Far be it from me to assume anything. I have, as you know, been warned against such things. I am not surprised in the least that you are your own advocate. I am surprised you believe in the Devil as anything more than catch phrase but I make no assumptions. Evil, whatever you choose to call it, is everywhere; at my house and yours. And with the system we have, Libertarians would be as guilty as any other party would at committing acts of corruption with equal power and financing, I believe. I don't how it all keeps getting back to my ass, but I would prefer to call Dr. Dean the frontrunner over the General. Well, again, I shall post as I see fit. Find what you wish in my posts, but they will be what they will be. As to the Devil, that's only a figure of speech, except as applied to Democrats. Ad to Guv Deanie Bopper, I think frontrunner is a great term. But that seems to fit a lot of Democrats. Of course, calling Old Wes a Democrat is kind of cheating, anyway. His pedigree as a Democrat is kind of like the new Joe Millionaire's pedigree as an Italian baron, that is, only a few weeks old. |
|
|
|
Post by emilysrevolution on Oct 21, 2003 0:35:50 GMT -5
C.J., you are so clever it is beyond the words my daft little mind can exact to describe. If you cannot answer my questions or will not, at least you will make me laugh. I see now you are a talk the talker but when it comes to walking, you just stumblefuck around a conversation. It's cute. It's adorable in fact.
Thank you Rick. You exaggerate about me, I think, but your enthusiasm will not be forgotten. And I will say this for Rick: he makes a damn pretty baby. And when I tell him to drop his pants, he does. He is always willing to flaunt his uncircumsized member (his wife's permission willing-- and it usually is).
|
|
|
|
Post by CJYJTJ on Oct 21, 2003 1:21:35 GMT -5
C.J., you are so clever it is beyond the words my daft little mind can exact to describe. If you cannot answer my questions or will not, at least you will make me laugh. I see now you are a talk the talker but when it comes to walking, you just stumblefuck around a conversation. It's cute. It's adorable in fact. Thank you Rick. You exaggerate about me, I think, but your enthusiasm will not be forgotten. And I will say this for Rick: he makes a damn pretty baby. And when I tell him to drop his pants, he does. He is always willing to flaunt his uncircumsized member (his wife's permission willing-- and it usually is). Stumblefuck around the conversation? Hell no? I've lead you all over the place, and you've yet to get what you wanted. Who's been stumbling? You're the one who's been shouting...  ...while I've been laughing at your insistance in finding substance on an internet forum. Say.. speaking of you & Rick... is this you two at the pool last summer?  Okay, well, get back to me on that. It was furnished to me by a coworker or Rick's. Let's be international, eh what?  |
|
|
|
Post by emilysrevolution on Oct 21, 2003 12:55:23 GMT -5
Stumblefuck around the conversation? Hell no? I've lead you all over the place, and you've yet to get what you wanted. Who's been stumbling? You're the one who's been shouting... ...while I've been laughing at your insistance in finding substance on an internet forum. Say.. speaking of you & Rick... is this you two at the pool last summer? Okay, well, get back to me on that. It was furnished to me by a coworker or Rick's. Let's be international, eh what? My mistake was in thinking I might find substance in anything you have to say. Again, clever, big show, good sell. And alas! Nothing. Although it's been fun, you have only offered insult because you have nothing else to offer. I should hope you have been laughing. You have not been laughing alone. You used to be a Republican, I think. You argue the same way. Fake it 'til you make it. I am sure you will be happy to respond to this with more ego maniacal banter about how funny you find yourself and how ridiculous you find me. I can only hope to enjoy your dellusional thinking more and more.  |
|
|
|
Post by CJYJTJ on Oct 21, 2003 15:50:00 GMT -5
My mistake was in thinking I might find substance in anything you have to say. Again, clever, big show, good sell. And alas! Nothing. Although it's been fun, you have only offered insult because you have nothing else to offer. I should hope you have been laughing. You have not been laughing alone. You used to be a Republican, I think. You argue the same way. Fake it 'til you make it. I am sure you will be happy to respond to this with more ego maniacal banter about how funny you find yourself and how ridiculous you find me. I can only hope to enjoy your dellusional thinking more and more. I always thought you Democrats preferred style over substance. You should realize the more you taunt, the less likely I am to respond to you on any serious level. I haven't found you much worth taking serious as it is anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by RS Davis on Oct 21, 2003 17:30:31 GMT -5
I always thought you Democrats preferred style over substance. You should realize the more you taunt, the less likely I am to respond to you on any serious level. I haven't found you much worth taking serious as it is anyway. In fairness, while some are clever, most of your posts thus far have been random ad hominum insults. - Rick |
|
|
|
Post by CJYJTJ on Oct 21, 2003 18:45:26 GMT -5
In fairness, while some are clever, most of your posts thus far have been random ad hominum insults. - Rick Not really. I've removed any randomness and they've been pointed. But, I digress. It seems to me I've given about what I've gotten. I've made the points I intend to make as I intended to. I am who I am. I told you privately I saw things here which concerned me and you told me privately to hang around. Don't complain that I am being who I am. That's disingenuous. I've so far been told not to have my "panties in a bunch" (I don't wear panties, don't know if you do") and otherwise had a number of slights at the hand of Em, and otherwise had a few verbal slights, plus had Barmax call me a liar (as well as calling Nota a liar, but that's her problem) and a few other issues. I've been posting with sarcasm, dark wit, and a measure of satire here. If you're displeased, fine, but it's no different than I've received back, but with embedded pics. I'm a graphical kind of guy. |
|
|
|
Post by RS Davis on Oct 21, 2003 23:18:21 GMT -5
Not really. I've removed any randomness and they've been pointed. But, I digress. It seems to me I've given about what I've gotten. I've made the points I intend to make as I intended to. I am who I am. I told you privately I saw things here which concerned me and you told me privately to hang around. Don't complain that I am being who I am. That's disingenuous. I've so far been told not to have my "panties in a bunch" (I don't wear panties, don't know if you do") and otherwise had a number of slights at the hand of Em, and otherwise had a few verbal slights, plus had Barmax call me a liar (as well as calling Nota a liar, but that's her problem) and a few other issues. I've been posting with sarcasm, dark wit, and a measure of satire here. If you're displeased, fine, but it's no different than I've received back, but with embedded pics. I'm a graphical kind of guy. Well, you've certainly been relentlessly mean to Barmax, even before that stuff about multiple names. And Emily was just trying to get a conversation going. I'm not scolding you. There's free speech here. I'm just making an obervation. I mean, some of your insults have been pretty funny. - Rick |
|
|
|
Post by RS Davis on Oct 23, 2003 12:01:41 GMT -5
Well, if we had the government our forefathers had intended, we wouldn't have a nation full of cowboys running around preaching about their 2nd amendment rights to conceal whatever weapons they want in their pockets at church. We would have well organized state militias protecting the people from the federal government. But that is not here and it certainly is not up there. As a private business - for profit or not - I support the Church's right to not allow concealed weapons on their premises. I don't necessarily think it is a character flaw of the parties either. Of course, where you say less government involvement to rid the special interests, you know I will say something about a new regulation or law or something and call it Campaign Finance Reform to rid us of special interests. It is funny to me how Democrats are always accused of bearing bleeding hearts but we really don't trust the masses to do the right thing for the country as a whole on their own. I see that line of thinking as problematic and the road to chaos (which your wife will think is fine). I don't believe I can trust my fate to the good will of my fellow man because it is my fellow man's (or woman's) will that lynched blacks until they went to jail for it. It is my fellow person (let's be PC!) that continues to pay women less money to the dollar than men for the same work with the same qualifications ("Jesus. Not a feminist too?" you may be thinking). I want my ERA damn it. It is the Libertarians who believe the will of the people can be trusted at all times to do the right thing. It is actually very beautiful. I admire that about you guys. But enough of that. At least we can agree on part of the problem. Libertarians don't necessarily trust their fellow man - that's why we want to limit their ability to use the federal government to impose their will on us. We want people to be allowed to live peacefully and independently, making their own decisions about their own lives. As for lynchings and such, well, that would be not living peacefully and independently. It is an initiation of force, which the libertarian credo expressly disapproves of, and we support defensive force being applied by the government in such a situation. Although, even with the limited government you believe our forefathers intended, would not there still be the power (if not also the money-- just from wealthy individuals who can afford to run) that corrupts politicians into playing the sleezy games that so many of us are tired of seeing. And then, would that not cross lines into the Libertarian and Green camps as well? I don't think so. Even with all kinds of money, if the government is not allowed to grant special favors and treatment to anyone, they will have no need to try to excersize any control. Ricky, how would you even start to fix this government if you could, focusing first with the disgusting behavior of those who would ask us to vote them into positions of power? I mean, where would you go from here? And since there are corrupt people who make the choice to be corrupt plaguing our system, how do you make them stop? I would start by proposing two amendments to the Constitution - the first to abolish the income tax, and the second to state that the government cannot give one person something without giving it also to everyone else. - Rick |
|
too lazy still whatever
Guest
|
Post by too lazy still whatever on Oct 23, 2003 17:37:34 GMT -5
Not really. I've removed any randomness and they've been pointed. But, I digress. It seems to me I've given about what I've gotten. I've made the points I intend to make as I intended to. I am who I am. I told you privately I saw things here which concerned me and you told me privately to hang around. Don't complain that I am being who I am. That's disingenuous. I've so far been told not to have my "panties in a bunch" (I don't wear panties, don't know if you do") and otherwise had a number of slights at the hand of Em, and otherwise had a few verbal slights, plus had Barmax call me a liar (as well as calling Nota a liar, but that's her problem) and a few other issues. I've been posting with sarcasm, dark wit, and a measure of satire here. If you're displeased, fine, but it's no different than I've received back, but with embedded pics. I'm a graphical kind of guy. cj, I thoroughly enjoy your posts  I can't help it, I'm just that evil! If the jabs were at me, I might not like them as much. Hey, fellow IT/IS type, I'm drawing up almost a complete QA plan. Because there basically isn't one. Why is it that so many places I walk into have had to let at least one, sometimes more, important practices of good information system maint/management/development? We learn shit in school, and then we see these train wrecks! Rick, I love your site. You mentioned writing about topics, and I would be honored to write about legalization of marijuana, drug wars, and other things. We saw Judge Gray this weekend at WASHU, and a few other speakers. It was great. Unfortunately, the seats were'nt exactly filled though, and then we couldn't stay for all of it. I had to walk out while an friend was about to speak  Hey, for all I know you were there too I'm lousy with names anyway. And your son has a great name, good for you! Sounds like he's doing great It was funny, btw, when you asked what I thought of "Rand, Roddenberry, and Reason...". My middle name is Ayn; I just about had to read her;) Well...have to go...it's almost Law and order time |
|
promise next time whatever
Guest
|
Post by promise next time whatever on Oct 23, 2003 17:40:29 GMT -5
I am not so much looking for a complete answer here. I have given up any pipe dream of that occuring. I am moreover looking for any answer to any question you see fit to answer. In that respect, you haven't offered too much (outside of some mildly witty retort which I would never suggest isn't much). You're cute (or is that just another Democratic assumption?) and thanks for the advice. I fully appreciate the person who is willing to tell me what I should and should not do. That quality is so few and far between, not unlike the sarcasm throughout this forum. It is not "what I see is all there is" that makes me a Democrat. It is "actions speak louder than words" that makes me a Virgo. But you know me so well, I leave the assumptions to you. I already know why I'm a Democrat. I will say that at least my assumptions, I am willing to admit are assumptions. Not that you are not. Far be it from me to assume anything. I have, as you know, been warned against such things. I am not surprised in the least that you are your own advocate. I am surprised you believe in the Devil as anything more than catch phrase but I make no assumptions. Evil, whatever you choose to call it, is everywhere; at my house and yours. And with the system we have, Libertarians would be as guilty as any other party would at committing acts of corruption with equal power and financing, I believe. I don't how it all keeps getting back to my ass, but I would prefer to call Dr. Dean the frontrunner over the General. Hi Emily, How's the revolution going? Sorry I haven't been paying much attention, but whom are you revolting against? Aside from cj, which I just cannot understand. But that's okay, anyone will tell you I'm slow |
|
|
|
Post by RS Davis on Oct 23, 2003 18:54:42 GMT -5
Rick, I love your site. You mentioned writing about topics, and I would be honored to write about legalization of marijuana, drug wars, and other things. We saw Judge Gray this weekend at WASHU, and a few other speakers. It was great. Unfortunately, the seats were'nt exactly filled though, and then we couldn't stay for all of it. I had to walk out while an friend was about to speak Hey, for all I know you were there too I'm lousy with names anyway. And your son has a great name, good for you! Sounds like he's doing great It was funny, btw, when you asked what I thought of "Rand, Roddenberry, and Reason...". My middle name is Ayn; I just about had to read her;) Well...have to go...it's almost Law and order time Well, with a middle name like that, you were destined for libertarianism. Ironically, though, Ayn didn't believe in destiny... Yeah, I'd love for you to write something! Post it in the Freedomphiles Originals section. I read Judge Gray's book. It was fantastic. It stopped short of advocating wholesale legalization, but it seems he's taken that final leap now. - Rick |
|
